• FREE RESOURCES
        • Accounts Payable
          Finally! The trick to securing greater T&E compliance
          Benefits
          Rooting out folks who don’t belong on your health plan: A 6-point dependent audit checklist
          IT
          3 costly misconceptions about biz email compromise
          Credit and Collections
          Collecting via email: 4 must-make moves in your subject line
          Accounts Payable
          5 Tough-to-spot signs that an invoice is fake
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
        • Staff management
          120 Proven Communications Tips for Today’s CFO
        • Payroll
          Handling Nonexempt Employee Pay: Stay Compliant and Avoid DOL Audits
          Accounts Payable
          T&E Best Practices: Complete Guide to Ensure Compliance
          Payroll
          Payroll Best Practices: 4 Ways to Save Time and Money
        • Staff management
          Email Best Practices: A 6-Question Quiz
          Staff management
          Innovative Communications Strategies: An Email Case Study
          Staff management
          A 5-part Framework for Successful Workplace Communications
        • SEE MORE
          PREMIUM RESOURCES
  • CORONAVIRUS RESOURCES
  • LOGIN
  • SIGN UP FREE

CFO Daily News

  • FREE RESOURCES
        • Accounts Payable
          Finally! The trick to securing greater T&E compliance
          Benefits
          Rooting out folks who don’t belong on your health plan: A 6-point dependent audit checklist
          IT
          3 costly misconceptions about biz email compromise
          Credit and Collections
          Collecting via email: 4 must-make moves in your subject line
          Accounts Payable
          5 Tough-to-spot signs that an invoice is fake
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
        • Staff management
          120 Proven Communications Tips for Today’s CFO
        • Payroll
          Handling Nonexempt Employee Pay: Stay Compliant and Avoid DOL Audits
          Accounts Payable
          T&E Best Practices: Complete Guide to Ensure Compliance
          Payroll
          Payroll Best Practices: 4 Ways to Save Time and Money
        • Staff management
          Email Best Practices: A 6-Question Quiz
          Staff management
          Innovative Communications Strategies: An Email Case Study
          Staff management
          A 5-part Framework for Successful Workplace Communications
        • SEE MORE
          PREMIUM RESOURCES
  • CORONAVIRUS RESOURCES
  • Accounts Payable
  • Credit and Collections
  • Payroll
  • Accounting
  • Benefits
  • Finance Technology
  • More
    • Employment Law
    • Strategy
    • Policy and Culture
    • Fraud
    • Payments and Transactions
    • Budgeting and Forecasting
    • Banking
    • Staff Management
    • Cost Control
    • Supply Chain
    • IT

Will common health plan feature now put you at risk for a lawsuit?

Jared Bilski
by Jared Bilski
May 4, 2018
  • Accounting
  • Benefits
3 minute read
  • SHARE ON

Heads up: A recent lawsuit puts employers in a very tricky spot regarding health plan compliance.

What’s worse, employers can’t even rely on guidance from the feds to protect themselves from illegal action.

That’s because of a recent move by a federal judge in AARP v. EEOC, a lawsuit claiming the government’s health plan incentive rules violate the ADA and GINA.

Illegal wellness incentives?

The above case hinged around the notion of a “voluntary” wellness program. Under the EEOC regs, employers can offer incentives of up to 30% of the total cost of coverage for self-only coverage for participation in company-sponsored wellness programs that include components like HRA and biometric screenings.

The AARP argued that such an incentive ran counter to the “voluntary” requirements of the ADA and GINA because employees who can’t afford to pay 30% more in premiums would essentially be forced to give up protected information they wouldn’t disclosed otherwise.

Essentially, a judge “vacated” the EEOC’s current incentive rules beginning Jan. 1, 2019, and the EEOC has the option of reworking those regs in the interim.

The problem for employers

So why is this so problematic for employers?

First, assuming the EEOC does draft new regs on wellness incentives with a lower incentive threshold, adjusting to the new regs is going to be an administrative hassle that involves reworking plan designs and documents for employers.

But the interim period – the time between now and Jan. 1, 2019 – poses the most issues.

Reason: Even though companies may be able to follow the current EEOC wellness regs during this period, that move is far from a safe legal bet for employers.

Lawsuits like the AARP’s essentially open the door for employees and their sue-happy attorneys to use to attack incentive-based wellness programs.

4 alternatives to risky incentives

If you’re not comfortable taking the risks associated with incentive-based medical exams and health risk assessments (HRAs), there are other options.

Bruce Gillis, Businessolver’s strategy practice leader of health, welfare and compliance, offers the following options for concerned employers:

Give workers more choices. One surefire way to make wellness program participation truly voluntary is by giving workers the option of earning the same incentive in a manner that doesn’t involve biometric screenings or HRAs.

Example: an incentive based on completing an education requirement.

Reduce the incentive. The judge in the AARP case essentially said the current 30% incentive maximum was too high.

Decreasing the amount of your incentives for biometric screenings and/or HRAs not only reduces your risk of being accused of not having a voluntary program, it also sets you up for the future. That’s because the EEOC is likely to reduce the maximum incentive under the
new regs.

Put incentives on hold. While employers wait for further EEOC guidance, the safest move is to fully eliminate wellness incentives.

If you do go this route, you may want to direct the incentive budget toward other benefits employees want – financial wellness, more flexible work arrangements, PTO, etc.

Switch the incentive structure. Finally, employers can restructure their incentives so that no rewards are specifically tied to biometric screenings or HRAs. Gillis uses the example of blood screenings that test for nicotine. Or, instead of using the exam, simply ask employees if they use tobacco and adjust premiums accordingly.

Note: This story was originally published on our sister website, HR Morning.

Keep Up To Date with the Latest Finance News

With CFO Daily News arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on accounting, benefits, payroll & employment law strategies.

Sign up for a free CFO Daily News membership and get our newsletter!
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
CFO Daily News Logo
  • ABOUT CFO DAILY NEWS
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Accounting
  • Benefits
  • Payroll
  • Policy and Culture
  • Employment Law
  • Fraud
  • Finance Technology
  • Accounts Payable
  • Credit and Collections
  • Strategy
  • Payments and Transactions
  • Budgeting and Forecasting
  • Banking
  • Staff Management
  • Cost Control
  • Supply Chain
  • IT

CFO Daily News, part of the SuccessFuel Network, provides the latest Finance and employment law news for Finance professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day’s headlines, CFO Daily News delivers actionable insights, helping Finance execs understand what Finance trends mean to their business.

Privacy Policy Terms of Service
Copyright © 2021 SuccessFuel

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

preloader